What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael (2018) B-


Was it really what she said?

Pauline Kael was the greatest movie critic of her generation.

Pauline Kael, the greatest movie critic of her generation, was lucky enough to come of age (in her late forties) precisely as “the new Hollywood” of the late sixties was born. This era of gloriously free and experimental filmmaking is considered to have lasted a good 13 years, from the twin release of Arthur Penn’s “Bonnie and Clyde” and Mike Nichols “The Graduate” in 1967 to the twin catastrophes of Michael Cimino’s “Heaven’s Gate” and Francis Ford Coppola’s “One from the Heart” in late 1980 and early 1982, respectively.

The power dynamic shifted back to the studios.

Like the mid-1920s and the formation of the Hollywood studios, the early 1980s also signaled the end of the all-powerful director and the reinstatement of the studio and producer as the decisive force in Hollywood. Pauline’s career followed a similar arc, although her New Yorker pieces were widely read until she retired in 1991 because of progressive Parkinson’s disease.

Pauline’s reviews were essential reading.

Pauline’s reviews were essential reading for any dedicated moviegoer and budding film critic who came of age during that period. If you missed even one, you felt culturally malnourished. And, like all great film critics, it didn’t matter whether you agreed with her opinion – with me, it was always about 50/50 – it was the way she wrote and the points she raised that mattered. Her review of “Blue Velvet” is one of the great pieces from her later years.

De Palma and Lean.

If she had a weak point, it was favoritism (someone like Brian De Palma got off way too easy on several occasions). Also, the reverse – poor David Lean retired for 14 years after her excoriating, hilarious, and, in my opinion, perfectly accurate reviews of “Dr. Zhivago” from 1965 and “Ryan’s Daughter” from 1970.

Pauline and Queer Cinema

Pauline also had an exciting relationship with queer cinema and the queer lifestyle. Her husband was bisexual, and on their first visit to NYC from the West Coast, he ended up dumping her and going off to live with the classical music’s most famous gay couple, Gian-Carlo Menotti (“Amahl and the Night Visitors”) and Samuel Barber (“Adagio for Strings”). That must have stung. Starting with her reviews in the early sixties, Pauline would often refer to a friend, sometimes a real friend, sometimes invented, that she had bought along to the screening to use as a sounding board. Many of these “friends” were straight. However, the majority were queer.

Was it Really What She Said?

Recently (2018), director Rob Garver released a documentary titled What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael”. The movie is made with love and, at least for this viewer, contains only one major surprise. Of course, we have the usual talking heads saying what we have known about Pauline for decades. However, the appearance of one talking head got to me. That was director Ridley Scott giving his opinion on Pauline’s review of his classic movie “Blade Runner.”

Blade Runner

Blade Runner”. “It has its place in movie history.”

Now, I am a huge “Blade Runner” fan – just the ORIGINAL cut, thank you – and I must have seen it at least five times when it was released in the summer of 1982. I also reveled in Pauline’s positive review. It was a gorgeous, intelligent, and supremely descriptive review – you could almost taste the acid rain falling on a dystopian 2019 Los Angeles. “It has its place in movie history,” she said. The New Yorker’s perfect title for her review was “Baby the Rain Must Fall.” It, therefore, came as quite a shock to hear that Mr. Scott perceived Pauline’s piece as a negative review that took a David Lean-like toll on his work ethic. Did we read the same piece of movie criticism?

An intelligent and respectful review.

Pauline wrote the most intelligent and respectful response of all the significant critics at the time. Remember, in the summer of 1982, most critics looked at “Blade Runner” with condescension and contempt. They were too busy writing encomiums on Spielberg’s now-dated “ET.” On Siskel and Ebert, Mr. Roger held the movie in such disdain that he kept referring, on and on, to the replicONS. For any “Blade Runner” fan, it is painful to watch.

Did they read what she said?

Did the filmmakers read what Pauline said in this case? The irony speaks for itself. Fifteen years after she turned the film world and the critical establishment upside down with her review of “Bonnie and Clyde,” in the summer of 1982, she was still ahead of the Zeitgeist.


BLADE RUNNER 1982 (the version released in the summer of 1982 and the only version I will watch) is available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video.

BLADE RUNNER: FINAL CUT (Ridley Scott’s final cut) is available on Amazon Prime and Apple TV.


Popular Articles

There Was A Crooked Man (1970) Film Review    B+

There Was A Crooked Man (1970) Film Review B+

Hume Cronyn and John Randolph are our happy and well-adjusted gay couple. Yes, they fight and bicker all the time. However, they are clearly madly in love with each other.

Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949) Film Review  A+

Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949) Film Review A+

In “Kind Hearts and Coronets”: Alec Guinness has fun playing all eight (or nine) of the unfortunate D’Ascoynes, including Lady Agatha D’Ascoyne. The photograph shows Dennis Price with Joan Greenwood who plays that little minx Sibella.

Subscribe for the latest reviews right in your inbox!